Consensus definitions

Starting from almost the worst, from a dehumanized, mammoth organization, made up of officials, taking into account that it is a technical agreement between hostile parties in the world.

The united nations, define this, as Consensus regarding indigenous peoples.

https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/IPeoples/FreePriorandInformedConsent.pdf

Considering that the declaration comes after 400 years of slavery and exploitation, they define what consent means at a minimum:

Asking permission from native/indigenous peoples, with the stipulations that it be:

* given FREELY, not coerced, blackmailed or altered.

* PRIOR, first I ask you to do things, then I do them.

* INFORMED, you are entitled to all the information you need to understand the application and evaluate it.

:::::

This got me thinking about a better articulated definition of consensus that came from below, the FRIE consensus.

Free, freely given

Revocable, revocable

Informed, informed

Entusiastic, enthusiastic

Found in the American fanzine: Meeting for Group Health. Paper only, sorry.

:::::

Tied to technologies the reflection of the Brazilian feminists of Codingrights:

https://codingrights.org/docs/ConsentToOurDataBodies.pdf

on Pages 24 and 25, offer a definition of consent that they claim is taken into account, and not replaced, by buttons: AGREE.

1) active

2) withdrawable

3) clear

4) informed

5) specific and non-transferable

:::::

Another resource I came across to talk about consent, this video:

Consent Explained with Tea

ecco da dove è iniziato: https://web.archive.org/web/20150313233048/http://www.rockstardinosaurpirateprincess.com/2015/03/02/consent-not-actually-that-complicated/